Financial Economics
Teimur Mohammadi; Mohammad Reza Feghhi Kashani; Mahdi Samei
Abstract
The negative correlation between an asset’s volatility and its return is known as the “leverage effect”. This relation is explained by the effect of the return of a firm’s equity on the degree of leverage in its capital structure. If this relation holds, the increased volatility ...
Read More
The negative correlation between an asset’s volatility and its return is known as the “leverage effect”. This relation is explained by the effect of the return of a firm’s equity on the degree of leverage in its capital structure. If this relation holds, the increased volatility resulting from a fall in stock price should be comparable with the decreased volatility resulting from a price rise with the same magnitude and also, this effect should be persistent. Most of the researches in the “leverage effect” examine the relation between volatility and stock return. To examine the effects of both returns and financial leverage on volatility data from the 22 biggest companies from March 2009 to March 2019 in Tehran Stock Exchange are collected. To find the leverage the value of debt in the capital structure of selected companies is calculated using Geske compound option pricing model. The data show the leverage effect only in negative returns and may have a negligible direct connection to the firm leverage.
Saeed Rasekhy; Amir Khanalipour
Volume 13, Issue 40 , October 2009, , Pages 29-57
Abstract
Stock markets are strong means of attracting savings and directing them to investors، but their rate of returns are subject to fluctuations much higher than other economic variables. This paper is to examine of the volatility in the Tehran stock marketusing the conditional heteroscedasticity technique ...
Read More
Stock markets are strong means of attracting savings and directing them to investors، but their rate of returns are subject to fluctuations much higher than other economic variables. This paper is to examine of the volatility in the Tehran stock marketusing the conditional heteroscedasticity technique for the period 1370:0-1386:06. Based on the results obtained، (1) distribution of the return has positive skewness indicating that market players consider occurrence of negative returns more likely. (2) Return series is not normaly distributed and has more height than normal curve. (3) Calendar has no significant effect on return with the exception of second، fifth and ninth months of the year. (4) Weak Information efficiency is rejected. Thus، not all market factors transact professionally and، the information and the news affect stock price with a time delay. (5) Inflation has positive effect on returns fluctuations، but is not significant . (6) Exchange rate (Rials/$) has positive and significant but samll effect on return fluctuations. The small effect is probably due to the fact that there is only a little share of Dollar in shareholders portfolio. Finally، (7) Assumption of normal distribution for residuals is not suitable. In contrast، t and general error distributions if surplus kurtosis is considered are proper assumptionsGovernments can play have an important role in affecting the demand for planning and preparing the food these security through their protection policies such as providing subsidies. subsidizing the main or basic categories of food in the same time subsidies will increase the government expenditure،therefore، it is necessary to set goals carefully. However، as subsidies will increase government expenditure and will cost the economy، they should be targeted to people who need them the most. In this article، we estimate the demand for main or basic foods، (i.e.bread، meat، milk، oil and sugar) have been estimated by using AIDS Model and taking into account household budget survey data in urban areas and consumer price index through two stage model and cointegration for the periodyears 1363-1384. At every stage، estimation was done for both the short-run and the long-run and the homogenous constraint and symmetric have been examined by Wald test. As an instrument of analysis، We obtain price elasticity، income elasticity and cross price elasticity of demand have been calculated forin the short-run and the long-run. The results show that reducing subsidies on these goods would put a pressure on consumer expenditure through the rise in the prices. However، changes in the structurel of subsidies with a gradual reduction in the amount of subsidies for bread، oil and sugar and directing them payment toward meat and milk within a structured goal is recommended.will be more beneficial.
