Iranian Journal of Economic Research

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Memorandum of Understanding

Reviewers(2019)

Reviewers(2020)

Reviewers(2021)

Reviewers(2022)

Reviewers(2023)

The Nature and Function of Prices in the Visible and Invisible Production Process of Products in the Monetary and Physical Tables: The Case Study of Germany’s Tables

Authors

1 Professor, Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, IRAN.

2 M.A. Student, the Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, IRAN

3 M.A. Student, the Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, IRAN.

4 - M.A. Student, the Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, IRAN.

Abstract

In the combined domain of economy and environment, the process of production of goods and services contain three intertwined cycles: primary cycle (natural resources), secondary cycle (intermediate and final goods and services) and the end cycle (overflows, wastes or waste disposal to the environment). The Monetary Input - Output Table (MIOT) organizes only the visible production process of goods and services and data are in terms of price - quantity simultaneously. Prices in MIOT are ordinary, homogeneous and positive for an accounting period. The other two cycles are exogenous with zero prices. As they are outside of the accounting system, we call them invisible cycles. In order to remove this limitation, the Physical Input - Output Table (PIOT) has been designed by some of European countries at the end of 20th Century. This table considers simultaneously all the three cycles in the visible manner. The data are of physical in nature (in tons) without prices and mass unit instead of value unit is used. The design of the PIOT parallel to the MIOT is triggered by two major questions among the analysts in the 21th Century. Firstly, which one of the two tables can reveal the interworen physical nature of economic-environment and sustainable development? Secondly, analogous to the basic theory of MIOT, is it possible to model the PIOT? With respect to the questions posed, the existing literature in the past fifteen years are classified into three groups: The empirical evidences of the first group show that as compared to the MIOT, the PIOT has more potentiality in revealing the physical nature of the combined economic-environment in relation to the sustainable development. This finding is questioned by the second group. The third group has cast doubts to the pros and cons of the treatment of waste as input or output and suggest that the differences are not in the treatment of waste as an input or output. According to them, the root of the differences lies in the nature and the function of prices in both the MIOT and PIOT. The third group overshadows two points: One is that they have not identified the use of the different types of prices like; implicit, unit and homogeneous or implicit matrix prices in converting PIOT to MIOT. Second is that they have not discussed the issue of the balancing of the converted PIOT to MIOT. Based on the 1990 PIOT and MIOT of Germany, we demonstrate first of all that the double deflation method cannot convert the PIOT into MIOT and secondly, use of the implicit matrix price under the assumption of the zero price of waste can convert the PIOT into the MIOT.

Keywords

References
اصغرپور موزیرجی، حسین‌علی،  فرشاد مؤمنی وعلی اصغر بانوئی (1393)، «تحول بخش  خدمات در مسیر توسعه یافتگی: مقایسه خدمات توزیعی و خدمات تولیدی»، فصلنامه سیاستگذاری اقتصادی، شماره 6، صص 122-91.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر (1391)، «ارزیابی شقوق مختلف نحوه منظور کردن واردات و     روش‌های تفکیک آن با تأکید بر جدول متقارن سال1380»، فصلنامه سیاستگذاری اقتصادی، شماره 8، صص 74-31.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر (1394)، «سه سؤال اساسی در خصوص تحولات توصیه­های بین المللی ( SNA, 1968.SNA, 1993. SNA, 2008) در به‌کارگیری فروض تکنولوژی جداول متقارن و کاربست آن­ها در محاسبه جداول متقارن سال 1390 مرکز آمار ایران»، معاونت اقتصادی و محاسبات حساب­های ملی مرکز آمار ایران.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر، فاطمه بزازان و مهدی کرمی (1385)، «بررسی کمی رابطه بین ابعاد اقتصاد فضا و ضرایب داده - ستانده 28 استان کشور»، فصلنامه پژوهش­های اقتصادی ایران، شماره 29، صص 170-143.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر، فرشاد مؤمنی و سید ایمان آزاد (1387)، «بررسی کمی جایگاه بخش خدمات و زیر بخش­های آن در اقتصاد ایران»، فصلنامه اقتصاد و جامعه، شماره­های 15 و 16، صص 90-63.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر، فرشاد مؤمنی و سید ایمان آزاد (1390)، «تحلیل­های ساختاری صنعت و خدمات با تأکید بر خدمات تولیدی و اقتصاد جدید»، فصلنامه سیاست­های اقتصادی، شماره 1، صص 43-15.
بانوئی، علی­اصغر، موسوی نیک، سید هادی، مجتبی اسفندیاری کلوکن و زهرا ذاکری (1394)، تعاریف و مفاهیم پایه­ای، پایه­های نظری و روش محاسبه جداول داده - ستانده متقارن: تجربه ایران و جهان، انتشارات مرکز پژوهش­های مجلس.
پاشا زانوس، پگاه، علی اصغر بانوئی و جاوید بهرامی (1392)، «تحلیل­های سیاستی نقش واردات در سنجش اهمیت بخش­های اقتصاد ایران»، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، شماره 67، صص 100-81.
مرکز آمار ایران (1386)، جدول داده - ستانده ایران سال 1380، تهران، ایران.
مهاجری، پریسا، بانوئی، علی اصغر، جلوداری ممقانی، محمد، عباس شاکری و منوچهر عسگری (1394)، «به‌کارگیری الگوریتم ریاضی آلمن در حذف عناصر منفی جدول متقارن داده - ستانده با فرض تکنولوژی کالا»، فصلنامه پژوهش­های اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار)، شماره دوم، صص 25-1.
 
Altimiras - Martin, A. (2014). "Analysing the Structure of the Economy Using Physical Input - Output Tables", Economic Systems Research, Vol. 16, No.4, pp. 463- 485.
Baumol, W.J. and Wolff, E.N. (1994). "A key Role for Input - Output Andysis in Policy Design", Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 93-113.
Bicknell, K.B, Ball, R.J, Cullen, R. and Bigsby, H.R. (1998). "New Methodology for the Ecological Footprint with an Application to the New Zealand Economy", Ecological Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 149-160.
Chapagain, A.K., and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2004). "Water FootPrints of Nations, Value of Water", Research Series, No.18, UNESCO, Delft, the Netherlands.
Chennery, H, Robinson, S. and Syrquin, M. (1986). "Industrialization and Growth, A Comparative Study", World Bank, Washington, D.C.
De-Mesnard, L. (2009). "Is the Ghosh Model Interesting?", Journal of Regional Science, Vol.49, No.2, pp.361-372.
Dietzenbacher, E. (1997). "In Vidication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price Model", Journal of Regional Science, Vol.37, No.4, pp. 629-651.
Dietzenbacher, E. (2005). "Waste Treatment in Physical Input - Output Analysis", Ecological Economics, Vol.55, No.1, pp. 11-23.
Dietzenbacher, E. and Hoen, A.R. (1998). "Deflation of Input - Output Tables from the User´s Point of View: A Heuristic Approach", Review of Income and Wealth, Vol.44, No.1, pp. 111-122.
Dietzenbacher, E. and Hoen, A.R. (1999). "Double Deflation and Aggregation", Environment and Planning, Vol.31, No.9, pp. 1695-1704.
Dietzenbacher, E. and Mukhopadhyay, K. (2007). "An Empirical Examination of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis for India? Towards a Green Leontief Paradox?", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.36, No.4, pp. 427-449.
Dietzenbacher, E. and Temurshoev, U. (2012). "Input - Output Impact Analysis in Current and Constant Prices: Does It Matter?" Journal of Economic Structure, Vol.1, No.4, pp. 1-18.
Dietzenbacher, E. and Velazquez, E. (2007). "Virtual Water and Water Trade in Andolusia: A Study by Means of Input- Output Model", Regional Studies, Vol.41, No.2, pp. 251-261.
Dietzenbacher, E., Giljum, S. Hubacek, K. and Suh, S. (2009). "Physical Input - Output Analysis and Disposal to Nature", in Sangwon Suh (ed.) Handbook of Input - Output Economics and Industrial Ecology, Springer, the Netherlands, pp. 123-137.
Duarte, R. and Yang, H. (2011). "Input - Output and Water: Introduction, Special Issue", Economic Systems Research, Vol.34, No.4, pp. 341-351.
Duarte, R. Sanchez, C.J. and Bielsa, J. (2002). "Analysis of Water use in Spanish Economy: An Input - Output Approach", Ecological Economics, Vol.43, pp. 71-85.
Eurostat (2008). Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input - Output Table, Luxenburg, Austria.
­Ferng, J.J. (2001). "Using Composition of Land Multiplier to Estimate Ecological Footprints Associated with Production Activities", Ecological Economics, Vol.37, No.2, pp. 159-172.
 Giljum, S. and Hubacek, K. (2001). "International Trade, Material Flows and Land Use: Developing a Physical Trade Balance for the European Union", International Institute for Applied Systems, Luxenburg, Austria.
Giljum, S. and Hubacek, K. (2004). "Alternative Approaches of Physical Input - Output Analysis to Estimate Primary Material Inputs of production and Consumption Activities", Economic Systems Research, Vol.16, No.3, pp. 301-310.
 Giljum, S., Hubacek, K. and Sun, L. (2004). "Beyond the Simple Material Balance: A Reply to Sangwon Suh´s Note on Physical Input - Output Analysis", Ecological Economics, Vol.48, No.1, pp. 19-22.
Guan, D. and Hubacek, K. (2007). "Assessment of Regional Trade and Virtual Water Flow in China", Ecological Economics, Vol.61, No.1, pp. 159-170.
 Hoekstra, A.Y. and Chapagain, A.K. (2006). "Water Footprints of Nations: Water Use by People as a Function of their Consumption Pattern", Water Research Management, Vol.21, No.3, pp. 35-48.
Hoekstra, R. (2010, a). "Physical Input - Output Tables: Developments and Future", 18th International Input - Output Conference, June 20-25, Sydney, Australia.
 Hoekstra, R. (2010, b). "Towards a Complete Database of Peer- reviewed Articles on Environmentally Extend Input - Output Analysis", Paper Presented for the 18th International Input - Output conference. June 20-25, Sydney, Australia.
 Hoekstra, R., Jeroen, C.J.M. and Vanden, B. (2006). "Constructing Physical Input - Output Table for Environmental Modeling and Accounting: Framework and Illustrations", Ecological Economics, No.59, pp. 375-393.
 Hubacek, k. and Giljum, S. (2003). "Applying Physical Input - Output Analysis to Estimate Land Appropriation (Ecological Footprints) of International Trade Activities", Ecological Economics, No.44, pp. 137-151.
 Hubacek, K. and Sun, L. (2001). "A Scenario Analysis of China´s Land Use and Land Cover Change: Incorporating Biophysical Information in Input - Output Modelling", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 367-397.
 Hubacek, K. and Sun, L. (2005). "Economic and Societal Changes in China and their Effects on Water Use, A Scenario Andysis", Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol.9, No.1-2, pp. 187-200.
 Joshi, S. (1999). "Product Environmental Life - Cycle Assessment, Using Input - Output Techniques", Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol.3, Nos.2 and 3, pp. 95-120.
 Lenzen, M. and Foran, B. (2001) "An Input - Output Analysis of Australian Water Usage", Water Policy, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 321-340.
 Leontief, W. (1970). "Environmental Repercussion and Economic Structure: An Input - output Approach", Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.52, No.1, pp. 262-271.
 Leontief, W. (1986). Input - Output Economics, Oxford University Press.
 Leontief, W. and Ford, D. (1972). Air pollution and Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input - Output Computation, in Brody, A and Carter, A.(eds.) Input - Output Techniques, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Input - Output Techniques, New York, pp. 9-30.
 Londero, E. (1999). "Secondary products, by - products in the Preparation of Input - Output Tables", Economic Systems Research, Vol.2, No.3, pp. 321-320.
 Miller, R.E. and Blair, P.D. (2009). Input - output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Second Edition, Cambrige University Press.
 Nakamura, S. and Kondu, Y. (2009). "Waste Input - Output Analysis: Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology", Springer, Chap.7.
 Rees, W.F. and Wackernagel, M. (1999). "Monetary Analysis: Turning a Blind Eye on Sustainability", Ecological Economics, No.29, pp. 47-52.
 Seton, F. (1993). "Price Models Based on Input - output Analysis: East and West", Economic Systems Research, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 101-121.
 Stone, R. (1972). "The Evaluation of Pollution: Balancing Gains and Losses", Minerva, Vol.10, No.3, pp. 412-425.
 Suh, S. (2004). "A Note on the Calculus for Physical Input - Output Analysis and its Application to Land Appropriation of International Activities", Ecological Economics, No.48, pp. 9-17.
Suh, S. and Huppes, G. (2002). "Missing Inventory Estimate Tool Using Extended Input - Output Analysis", International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol.7, No.3, pp. 134-140.
 Temurshoev, U. (2006). "Pollution on Haven Hypothesis or Factor Endowment Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Examination for the US and China", Working paper No.292, Charles University, Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Economic Institute.
United Nations (1992). Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting, Handbook of National Accounting, Interim Version (draft) United Nations, New York.
 United Nations (1993). Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting, Studies in Methods, United Nations, New York.
 United Nations (2001). System of Environmental and Economic Accounting, SEEA Revision, United Nations, New York United Nations (1995) The 1993 Systems of National Accounts, New York.
 United Nations (2009). The 2008 Systems of National Accounts,
 New York.
Velazquez, E. (2006). "An Input - Output Model of Water Consumption: Analysing Water Relationships in Andolusia", Ecological Economics, No.56, pp. 226-240.
Virtanen, S.K., et.al. (2011). "Carbon Footprint of Food - Approaches from National Input - Output Statistics and a LCA of a Food Portion", Journal of Cleaner Production, No.19, pp. 1849-1856.
 Weisz, H. and Duchin, F. (2006). "Physical and Monetary Input - Output Analysis: What Makes the Difference?" Ecological Economics, No.57, pp. 534-541.
 Xu, Y and Zhang, T. (2009). "A New Approch to Modeling Waste in Physical Input - Output Analysis", Ecological Economics, No.68, pp.   2475-2478.
Iranian Journal of Economic Research
Volume 21, Issue 68 - Serial Number 68
October 2016
Pages 57-97
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 03 July 2017
  • Accept Date: 03 July 2017
  • First Publish Date: 03 July 2017
Share
How to cite
Statistics