Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 M.Sc. in Economics, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Measuring the level of economic development in the counties of Khuzestan Province is essential due to the region’s cultural, economic, and environmental significance. Such an evaluation can aid policymakers, researchers, and local communities in making informed decisions about policy design, resource management, and planning. It also helps identify the underlying causes of economic disparities and promotes efforts to enhance the region’s economic resilience and sustainability. By identifying underperforming sectors, measuring economic development guides the formulation of targeted policies aimed at fostering a more diversified and resilient economy. The present research used the numerical taxonomy method and urban economic components in order to measure and compare the levels of development across the counties of Khuzestan Province in 2017 and 2020. A total of 65 indices were used, spanning a wide range of development dimensions, including agriculture, housing and welfare services, industry, education, health and medical services, macroeconomic performance, infrastructure and physical assets, and urban economy metrics. In 2017, Abadan, Ahvaz, and Shushtar ranked as the most developed counties, while Andika, Shadegan, and Haftkel ranked lowest. By 2020, Ahvaz and Abadan maintained their economic leadership; Behbahan and Dezful excelled in education; Mahshahr led in industry; and Dezful stood out in agriculture. Abadan was also the pioneer in healthcare services. These findings highlighted both progress in certain counties and the need for increased attention and support in others.

Introduction

The Human Development Report on Iran highlights significant regional disparities among provinces in terms of human development levels. Contrary to the convergence theory-which predicts a reduction in regional imbalances-these disparities have not diminished. In fact, the coefficient of dispersion among the studied units has increased. Measuring the level of economic development in the counties of Khuzestan Province is a critical scholarly endeavor with far-reaching implications for regional policy, resource allocation, and the overall well-being of its population. Located in southwestern Iran, Khuzestan Province is notable for its rich cultural heritage, economic significance, and environmental diversity. As such, a comprehensive assessment of the province’s economic development is essential for various stakeholders, including policymakers, researchers, and local communities. First, measuring economic development in Khuzestan provides a foundation for informed policymaking and effective resource management. By systematically collecting data on key economic indicators (e.g., employment rates and industrial growth), local and national governments can more effectively prioritize and implement development plans. This enables them to address inequalities and allocate resources to areas most in need. Moreover, assessing the economic development of Khuzestan’s counties is crucial for identifying the causes of deep economic disparities. It also plays a pivotal role in improving the resilience and sustainability of the region’s economy. Khuzestan Province faces specific challenges, including dependency on the oil industry, water resource management, and industrial diversification. Assessing economic development helps pinpoint vulnerable sectors and informs the formulation of targeted policies aimed at creating a more diverse and resilient economy. In general, measuring the economic development of Khuzestan’s counties is a multifaceted and essential task that can help informed decision-making, equitable economic growth, sustainability, and enhances the overall well-being of the population. In this respect, the current research aimed to assess the development levels of Khuzestan’s counties in 2017 and 2020.

Materials and Methods

This study used the numerical taxonomy method and urban economic components in order to conduct a comparative assessment of the levels of development across the counties of Khuzestan Province in 2017 and 2020.

Results and Discussion

The ranking results from 2017 indicated that Ahvaz was the most developed county in terms of education, healthcare, urban economy, and infrastructure. Mahshahr ranked highest in industry and economy, while Dezful was the most developed in agriculture. Other counties such as Behbahan, Abadan, Ramhormoz, Masjed Soleyman, and Shushtar also showed significant development in some specific indicators. By 2020, there were notable changes in the development rankings. Ahvaz and Abadan emerged as leaders in economic development, while Behbahan and Dezful led in education. Mahshahr maintained its leading position in the industrial sector, and Dezful continued to be the top county in agriculture. In terms of housing, welfare services, and infrastructure, Abadan, Behbahan, Dezful, Mahshahr, and Ahvaz ranked highest. Abadan took the lead in healthcare development. Regarding urban economy, Dezful, Ahvaz, Abadan, Shushtar, Ramhormoz, and Behbahan were among the leading counties. Furthermore, Shushtar, Ramhormoz, Ahvaz, Behbahan, Abadan, Khorramshahr, Izeh, Dezful, Omidieh, Mahshahr, and Masjed Soleyman showed notable development in infrastructure and physical indices. This analysis reflects the shifts, progress, and in some cases, regression in development indicators across the counties between 2017 and 2020.

Conclusion

Counties such as Ahvaz and Abadan, which have performed well in the economic and healthcare sectors, can capitalize on these strengths to promote development in other areas. Infrastructure development plays a key role in regional development; counties that are already developed in this regard can serve as examples for those that are less developed. Strategic investments in infrastructure can lead to improvements across other development indicators as well. Education is another critical area where improvement can yield significant benefits. In counties that are underperforming educationally, implementing educational programs and expanding access to educational resources can be beneficial. Similarly, enhancing healthcare services in counties with poor performance in this sector can directly contribute to a better quality of life and improved public welfare. Supporting agriculture and local industries is also essential. Counties with agricultural or industrial potential can boost their productivity and development outcomes through financial aid and technical support. Finally, achieving balanced development is crucial. Addressing existing inequalities and planning for balanced development across all counties can reduce disparities and improve the overall regional development.
Acknowledgements
We hereby express our gratitude to the Vice-Chancellor for Research Affairs at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, who assisted the authors in conducting this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors of the article declare that there is no conflict of interest in publishing the presented article.
Funding
This article is part of Fatemeh Mombeini’s master’s thesis in economics, conducted under the supervision of Dr. Seyed Amin Mansouri and Dr. Seyed Morteza Afghah at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. It was sponsored by the Vice-Chancellor for Research Affairs at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz under Grant No. SCU.EE1403.30460.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afghah, S.M., Ahangari, A. & Askaripour, H. (2020). Estimating Human Development Index of Iranian Provinces and investigating its impact on economic growth using Fuzzy logic. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 17(2), 89-121.
doi:10.22055/jqe.2019.29152.2064 [in Persian]
Alderete, M.V. (2020). Exploring the smart city indexes and the role of macro factors for measuring cities smartness. Social Indicators Research, 147, 567-589.
Aldrich, D.P. & Meyer, M.A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254-269.
Artmann, M., Inostroza, L. & Fan, P. (2019). Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree? In (Vol. 96, pp. 3-9): Elsevier.
Batmani, E. & Zaraatkish, S.Y. (2021). The degree of development in Kermanshah province towns using numerical Taxonomy. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(2), 1-24. Retrieved from
Beissinger, S.R., MacLean, S.A., Iknayan, K.J. & de Valpine, P. (2023). Concordant and opposing effects of climate and land-use change on avian assemblages in California’s most transformed landscapes. Science Advances, 9(8), eabn0250.
Bhattarai, K. & Budd, D. (2019). Effects of rapid urbanization on the quality of life. Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues: A Spatial Analysis, 327-341.
Chen, L. & Wang, K. (2022). The spatial spillover effect of low-carbon city pilot scheme on green efficiency in China's cities: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Energy Economics, 110, 106018.
doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106018
Cowen, M.P. & Shenton, R.W. (1998). Agrarian doctrines of development: Part I. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 25(2), 49-76.
Das, R.K. & Misra, H. (2017). Smart city and E-Governance: Exploring the connect in the context of local development in India. Paper presented at the 2017 Fourth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG).
Dewi, H.U. (2019). The analysis of factors that effect business development and income of MSMEs in Denpasar city. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(4), 118-126.
Dupont, V. (2007). Conflicting stakes and governance in the peripheries of large Indian metropolises–An introduction. Cities, 24(2), 89-94.
Easterlin, R.A. (1978). What will 1984 be like? Socioeconomic implications of recent twists in age structure. Demography, 15, 397-432.
Ebrahimi, M., Mansori, S., Afgah, S. & Mohammadi Dehchehshmeh, M. (2024). Investigating the impact of road transport infrastructure on the spatio-temporal development of the cities of Khuzestan province based on the new economic geography theory. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 11(3), 1-34.
          doi:10.22034/ecoj.2024.61884.3318 [in Persian]
Esmaeilzadeh, H., Safarkhani, R. & Mahmoudi, H. (2018). Development level of rural areas in the counties of Kermanshah province, Iran. Human Geography Research, 50(2), 355-374. doi:10.22059/jhgr.2017.60514 [in Persian]
Esmaeilzadeh, H., Salehpour, S. & Esmaeilzadeh, Y. (2016). Analyzing development level of Alborz province counties using combinatorial method. The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 20(3), 1-34. Retrieved from http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-3856-en.html
Fleischmann, M., Feliciotti, A. & Kerr, W. (2022). Evolution of urban patterns: Urban morphology as an open reproducible data science. Geographical Analysis, 54(3), 536-558.
Fleishman, S.M., Centinari, M., Bell, T.H. & Eissenstat, D.M. (2023). Assessing microbial communities across the fine root landscape. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74(6), 1751-1757.
Goldin, I. & Winters, L.A. (1995). The economics of sustainable development. Cambridge university press.
Hagan, S. (2014). Ecological urbanism: the nature of the city. Routledge.
Hall, J.V. & Krueger, A.B. (2018). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Ilr Review, 71(3), 705-732.
Hang, N.T. (2021). Educating and training labor force under Covid 19: Impacts to meet market demand in Vietnam during globalization and integration era. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 12(1), 179-184.
Huntington, S.P. (1965). Political development and political decay. World Politics, 17(3), 386-430.
Ikeda, K., Aizawa, H. & Gaspar, J.M. (2020). How and where satellite cities form around a large city: Bifurcation mechanism of a long narrow economy, MPRA Paper 104748, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Kutty, A.A., Wakjira, T.G., Kucukvar, M., Abdella, G.M. & Onat, N.C. (2022). Urban resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel machine learning approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134203.
Lewis, W.A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School of Economic and Social, 22, 139-191.
Mansouri, S.A., Afghah, S.M., Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, M. & Ebrahimi, M. (2024). Investigating the Direct and indirect effects of road transport infrastructure on the regional growth of the cities of Khuzestan province. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), Article in Press, doi:10.22055/jqe.2024.46844.2625 [in Persian]
Mansouri, S.A., Afghah, S.M., Sadeghi Amroabadi, B., Farazmand, H., Andayesh, Y. & Boudaghi, A. (2024). The Role of the government and large local companies in income distribution: A case study of Urban areas of Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 29(98), 198-233. doi:10.22054/ijer.2024.76813.1236 [in Persian]
Mansouri, S.A., Arman, S.A. & Hoseini, F. (2024). Explaining the effect pattern of crimes in Tehran on the economic growth of neighboring provinces (based on the core-periphery approach). Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), Article in Press,
doi:10.22055/jqe.2024.45875.2604 [in Persian]
Markusen, A. (2017). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. In Economy, 177-197, Routledge.
McCann, P. & Van Oort, F. (2019). Theories of agglomeration and regional economic growth: A historical review. In Handbook of regional growth and development theories (6-23): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Misra, R.P. (1985). Development issues of our time. Concept publishing company.
Mou, Y. & Xu, K. (2017). The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 432-440.
Muis, K.R., Ranellucci, J., Trevors, G. & Duffy, M.C. (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students' attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning and Instruction, 38, 1-13.
Papageorgiou, A., Henrysson, M., Nuur, C., Sinha, R., Sundberg, C. & Vanhuyse, F. (2021). Mapping and assessing indicator-based frameworks for monitoring circular economy development at the city-level. Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103378.
Przywojska, J. & Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A. (2020). A comprehensive approach: Inclusive, smart and green urban development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(1), 149-160.
Quinn, B. (2020). Arts festivals and the city. Culture-led urban regeneration, 42(5-6), 85-101.
Raghfar, H. & Fadavi Ardakani, M. (2015). An Analytical framework in the theory of development: Culture, power and inequality. Journal of Iranian Economic Issues, 1(2), 91-115. Retrieved from https://economics.ihcs.ac.ir/article_796_4d45b4548c4fce788eb9d8400ae0279b.pdf [in Persian]
Raszkowski, A. & Bartniczak, B. (2018). Towards sustainable regional development: economy, society, environment, good governance based on the example of Polish regions. Transformations in Business & Economics, 17(2), 44.
Ribeiro, L.R.D.C. (2005). A aprendizagem baseada em problemas (PBL): Uma implementação na educação em engenharia na voz dos atores.
Rostow, W.W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. The Economic History Review, 12(1), 1-16.
Sachs, J. (1988). Conditionality, debt relief and the developing country debt crisis. NBER Working Paper No. w2644.
Saebi, M.H. (2012). Comparative comparison of region's development case study: region of Razavi Khorasan. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 3(5), 35-50. Retrieved from
Sarkodie, S.A., Owusu, P.A. & Leirvik, T. (2020). Global effect of urban sprawl, industrialization, trade and economic development on carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 034049.
Saroukhani, B., Tavakoli Vala, J. & Rostamzadeh, A. (2012). Numerical Taxonomy and its application in social research. Journal of Historical Sociology, 4(1), 171-194. Retrieved from
Seers, D. (1980). Theoretical aspects of unequal development at different spatial levels. In Integration and unequal development: The experience of the EEC (9-23): Springer.
Shankar, R. & Shah, A. (2003). Bridging the economic divide within countries: A scorecard on the performance of regional policies in reducing regional income disparities. World Development, 31(8), 1421-1441.
Smith, A.D. (1969). Theories and types of nationalism. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 10(1), 119-132.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. Guilford press.
Todaro, M.P. & Smith, S.C. (2020). Economic development. Pearson UK.
Visi Nab, F., Babaei Aghdam, F., Alipour, K. & Niazi, C. (2016). Evaluation and ranking of the educational development levels of the provinces in the Zagros region using the multi-criteria VIKOR model. Educational Planning Studies, 5(9), 11-29. Retrieved from
Wolniak, R. & Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2021). The level of the quality of life in the city and its monitoring. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(3), 376-398.
Yang, B., Xu, T. & Shi, L. (2017). Analysis on sustainable urban development levels and trends in China's cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 868-880.
Zhao, M., Cheng, C., Zhou, Y., Li, X., Shen, S. & Song, C. (2021). A global dataset of annual urban extents (1992–2020) from harmonized nighttime lights. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 1-25.