Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A., Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The leverage ratio reflects a company’s relative reliance on capital and debt. Higher leverage ratios, indicating greater dependence on debt relative to equity, ceteris paribus, increase the firm’s financial risks. The present study examined the effect of income tax and deductible financial costs on the firm’s leverage ratios. The data was collected from companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2011–2020. Theoretically, higher effective tax rates and deductible financial costs are expected to lead to higher leverage ratios. These hypotheses were tested using a dynamic panel data model and the generalized least squares (GLS) method. The findings revealed that, after accounting for control variables, the effective income tax rate has no significant impact on the leverage ratio. However, financial costs have a positive and significant relationship with the leverage ratio.

Introduction

Modern theories of capital structure are rooted in Modigliani and Miller’s (1958) theory of irrelevance of capital structure. According to their theory, under conditions of perfect competition, with no taxes, symmetric information, and the absence of bankruptcy and agency costs, a firm’s value is independent of its financing sources. However, in practice, a firm’s value does depend on its financing sources. In another study, Modigliani and Miller (1963) relaxed the assumption of no taxes and demonstrated that introducing corporate income tax affects the firm’s capital structures. Firms tend to use more debt than equity to optimize financing costs because interest expenses are deductible from taxable income. However, increasing debt also raises the risk of insolvency. This trade-off in leveraging a firm’s capital structure suggests that firms determine an optimal debt-to-equity ratio by balancing the tax savings and bankruptcy costs associated with higher debt levels (Fama & French, 2005). In other words, a higher corporate income tax rate increases the tax shield, incentivizing firms to use more debt. The motivation to take the advantage of tax shield, in turn, increases the risk of bankruptcy (Faccio & Xu, 2015). In Iran, corporate income is subject to a flat tax rate of 25%. Additionally, financial costs, including interest expenses, are treated as deductible, reducing the firm’s tax burdens. Moreover, dividends are tax-exempt due to the absence of personal income tax. These conditions create an incentive for companies to distribute profits and rely more heavily on debt to finance their operations. The present study aimed to test this hypothesis by relying on empirical data.

Materials and Methods

This study used the following regression model to examine the effect of income tax and financial costs on corporate capital structure.
 
The dependent variable is the leverage ratio (lev), calculated as total debt divided by total assets (Chakrabarti & Gruzin, 2019; Rajan & Zingales, 1995). The independent variables are the effective tax rate (ETR) and financial costs (FC). The effective tax rate is determined by dividing tax payments by pre-tax income (Graham, 1996), while financial costs are calculated by dividing interest expenses by total debt (Hossain, 2015). To control for the effects of other factors, the research included several control variables: tangible assets (Gas, 2018; Rajan & Zingales, 1995), growth opportunities (Titman & Wessels, 1988), profitability (Li, 2020), company size (Gas, 2018; Panda & Nanda, 2020), and non-debt tax shields (Chakrabarti & Gruzin, 2019; Gas, 2018; Karadeniz et al., 2009). Before estimating the model using panel data, it was necessary to determine the appropriate data type by using the Limer’s F test. The Hausman test was conducted  to decide whether fixed effects (FE) or random effects (RE) is the more suitable estimation method (Gujarati, 2022). Based on the Hausman test results, the fixed effects method was deemed the most appropriate for estimating the model. Moreover, the Wooldridge test and the Wald test were used to evaluate autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity, respectively. Since the p-values in both tests are below 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected, indicating the presence of autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity in the model. Finally, the generalized least squares (GLS) method was applied to ensure the efficiency of the results (Baltagi, 2008).

Results and Discussion

The GLS method was used to estimate the panel model. As shown in Table 1, the probability of the Wald statistic is less than 0.05, indicating the statistical significance of the regressions (Torres Reyna, 2007). The results of the model estimation revealed that the coefficient for financial costs is significant, and its sign is as expected. Specifically, as financial costs increase, the capital structure becomes more leveraged. This finding aligns with the predictions of static trade-off theory and is consistent with the results of studies such as Akhtar and Massoud (2013).
         Table 1. Results of Model Estimation Based on Alternative Specifications (Dependent Variable: Leverage Ratio)




(5)


(4)


(3)


(2)


(1)


Variables




1.08*
(0.57)


0.24***
(0.095)


0.17*
(0.095)


0.24***
(0.095)


0.20**
(0.096)


Financial Cost




0.64*
(0.34)


0.04
(0.041)


0.05
(0.041)


0.04
(0.04)
 


0.06
(0.040)


Effective tax rate




 


-0.17***
(0.028)


-0.14***   (0.028)


-0.18***
(0.028)


-0.14***
(0.028)


Tangible assets




0.91
(0.16)


-0.03**
(0.015)


 


-0.03**
(0.015)


-0.02
(0.015)


Profitability
 




0.08***
(0.02)


 


-0.02***
(0.004)


 


-0.03***
(0.004)


Growth opportunities




 


-0.06***
(0.008)


-0.05***
(0.008)


-0.06***
(0.008)


 


Size




3.52
(5.69)


0.19
(1.81)


1.15
(1.84)


 


 


Non-debt tax shield




0.59***
(0.10)
 


 


 


 


 


Leverage(-1)




164.27
0.00


120.53
0.00


140.50
0.00


121.65
0.00


103.98
0.00


Wald chi2




P- value




 


1.007***
(0.057)


0.9***
(0.057)


1.00***
(0.056)


0.58***
(0.012)


Intercept




P=0.00


Arellano-bond test for AR(1) in first differences




P=0.132


Arellano-bond test for AR(2) in first differences




P=0.07


Hansen test




1540


1540


1540


1540


1540


Observation




*P<0.1, **P<0.05,***P<0.01                          Standard errors in parentheses




Table 1 presents the model estimation results using the GLS method in Column 1. Columns 2, 3, and 4 display the results of robustness check, with additional control variables included. Column 5 shows the outcomes of the model estimation using the Difference GMM method. A key aspect to note is the consistency of the estimation results. AR1 and AR2, as well as the Hansen test, are related to the GMM estimation in the fifth column.
Source: Research findings
The coefficient for the effective tax rate is not significant, meaning that changes in the effective tax rate do not influence the firm’s decisions regarding their capital structure. Although this finding is unexpected, it is consistent with the results of studies such as Pinto and Silva (2021), Saeedi and Mahmoudi (2011), and Alipour et al. (2015). These researches found the effect of the effective tax rate on the financial leverage ratio to be insignificant. Therefore, the hypothesis that the effective tax rate has a positive effect on financial leverage cannot be confirmed.

Conclusion

The estimation results indicated that financial costs have a positive and significant effect on financial leverage. This finding supports the idea that the deductibility of financial costs encourages economic agents to rely more heavily on debt. The results also suggested that the introduction of personal income tax and the taxation of dividends incentivizes companies to reconsider their profit distribution policies and rely more on internal financing rather than debt. This conclusion is consistent with the findings of Haji et al. (2022).

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abasi, M. (2022). Financial crisis and capital structure. Tehran: Amuzeshi Talifi Arshadan Institute. [In Persian].
Akhtar, P. & Masood, S. (2013). Analysis of capital structure determinant a case from Pakistan’s chemical sector companies listed at Karachi stock exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR)3(5). 43-49.
Alipour, M., Mohammadi, M.F.S. & Derakhshan, H. (2015). Determinants of capital structure: an empirical study of firms in Iran. International Journal of Law and Management57(1), 53-83.          
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2013-0004
Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 4). Chichester: Wiley.
Banaei, M.A., Hayoudi, Y. & Sahebgharani, A.A. (2015). Explaining the optimal capital structure using a model based on the correlation of financial leverage and some financial and functional variables. Economics and business research paper, 5(9), 15-24. [In Persian]
Barakat, M.H. & Rao, R.P. (2003). The role of taxes in capital structure: Evidence from taxed and non-taxed Arab economies.
Chakrabarti, R. & Gruzin, A. (2019). The impacts of taxation on capital structure in BRICS countries. Journal of Corporate Finance13(3), 94-110.
           http://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.13.3.2019.94-110
Chen, D.H., Chen, C.D., Chen, J. & Huang, Y.F. (2013). Panel data analyses of the pecking order theory and the market timing theory of capital structure in Taiwan. International Review of Economics & Finance, 27, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.09.011
Dashti, H. (2014). Investigating the effective factors on the capital structure of companies accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange [Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch].
https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/0f9f60e97b141f3e5092266d2521da2e. [In Persian]
DeAngelo, H. & Masulis, R.W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of financial economics8(1), 3-29.
           http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(80)90019-7
Durand, D. (1952). Costs of debt and equity funds for business: trends and problems of measurement. In Conference on research in business finance (pp. 215-262). NBER.
Faccio, M. & Xu, J. (2015). Taxes and capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis50(3), 277-300.
http://doi:10.1017/S0022109015000174.
Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. (2005). Financing decisions: who issues stock? Journal of financial economics76(3), 549-582.
          http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.003
Fan, J.P., Titman, S. & Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis47(1), 23-56.
          http://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109011000597
Frank, M.Z. & Goyal, V.K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics67(2), 217-248.
          http://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00252-0
Graham, J. R. & Harvey, C.R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of financial economics60(2-3), 187-243. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00044-7
Graham, J.R. (1996). Debt and the marginal tax rate. Journal of financial Economics41(1), 41-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00857-B
Gujarati, D.N. (2022). Basic econometrics. Prentice Hall.
Haji, M., Nassiriaghdam, A., Mohammadi, T. & Shakeri, A. (2022). The effects of Financialization on the physical investment of non-financial companies listed in Tehran stock exchange over 1388-1398 used multilevel panel data. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics studies 12(45), 47-78. https://doi.org/10.22084/AES.2022.25279.3381 [In Persian].
Harris, M. & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance46(1), 297-355.
           http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x
Hasani, M. & Shafiei, S. (2010). Estimating the effective tax rate on the basis of businesses and legal entities. Journal of Tax Research, 18(8): 125-151. https://sid.ir//paper/89726/fa [In Persian].
Heidariyan, N., Firouz, R. & Abbasjouie, M. (2017). Examining the relationship between tax avoidance and capital structure. Management and Accounting Researches, 4(34), 93-110. [In Persian].
Hossain, I. & Hossain, M.A. (2015). Determinants of capital structure and testing of theories: A study on the listed manufacturing companies in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance7(4), 176-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n4p176
Izadinia, S. & Resaiyan, A. (2009). Capital structure and corporate income     tax in Iran. Journal of Tax Research, 7(4), 31-41. [In Persian].
Jalali, V. (2018). Investigating the effect of taxes on the capital structure of companies accepted in Tehran stock Exchange [Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas].
https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/0f9f60e97b141f3e5092266d2521da2e. [In Persian].
Jedrzejczak-Gas, J. (2018). Determinants of the capital structure of TSL sector enterprises. Management, 22(1), 176-193. http://doi: 10.2478/ manment-2018-0013
Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics (pp. 77-132). Gower.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review76(2), 323-329.
          http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.99580
Karadeniz, E., Yilmaz Kandir, S., Balcilar, M. & Beyazit Onal, Y. (2009). Determinants of capital structure: evidence from Turkish lodging companies. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management21(5), 594-609.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910967827
Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. John Wiley & Sons.
Khoa, B.T. & Thai, D.T. (2021). Capital structure and trade-off theory: Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business8(1), 45-52. 
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.045
Kim, J., Yang, I., Yang, T. & Koveos, P. (2021). The impact of R&D intensity, financial constraints, and dividend payout policy on firm value. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101802.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101802
Kimiagari, A.M. & Einali, S. (2008). Providing a comprehensive model of capital structure. Financial Research Journal, 10(25), 91-108. [In Persian].
Lei, L. (2020). Research on the impact of tax shield effect on corporate capital structure-empirical analysis based on a-share listed companies. Modern Economy11(1), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.111012
Liang, C.C., Liu, Y., Troy, C. & Chen, W.W. (2020). Firm characteristics and capital structure: Evidence from ASEAN-4 economies. In Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance (pp. 149-162). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review48(3), 261-297.
          http://doi.org/10.2307/1809766
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M.H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American Economic Review, 433-443.
          http://doi.org/10.2307/1809167
Moradi, M. (2017). Investigating the effective factors on the capital structure of companies accepted in tehran stock Exchange [Kooshiar institute of higher education].
https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/0f9f60e97b141f3e5092266d2521da2e. [In Persian].
Myers, S.C. (1984). Capital structure puzzle.
Nguye, T.G., Nguyen, L. & Nguyen, T.D. (2021). Capital structure and its determinants: evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business8(10), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no10.0001
Overesch, M. & Voeller, D. (2010). The impact of personal and corporate taxation on capital structure choices. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 263-294. http://doi.org/10.1628//001522110x534853
Panda, A.K. & Nanda, S. (2020). Determinants of capital structure; a sector-level analysis for Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(5), 1033-1066.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2018-0451
Pinto, J.M. & Silva, C.S. (2021). Does export intensity affect corporate leverage? Evidence from Portuguese SMEs. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101418.
Pourzamani, Z., Jahanshad, A., Nemati, A. & Farhoudi Zare, P. (2011). Investigating factors affecting capital structure in corporates. The Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 2(8), 25-46. [In Persian]
Rahnama, F. & Badavarnahandi, Y. (2019). Effect of effective tax rate on capital structure. Accounting and Auditing Researches, 42(11), 193-210. [In Persian].
Rajan, R.G. & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance50(5), 1421-1460.
           http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05148.x
Rani, N., Yadav, S.S. & Tripathy, N. (2020). Capital structure dynamics of Indian corporates. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(2), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-12-2017-0125
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal9(1), 86-136.
Sabetfar, P., Abbaspour, M. & Jafari, A. (2016). Investigating the effects of ultimate ownership structure and corporate tax on the capital structure of Tehran stock exchange companies. First International Conference on Accounting, Economics and Banking [In Persian].
Saeedi, A.L.I. & Mahmoodi, I. (2011). The determinants of capital structure: evidence from an emerging market. In 2nd International Conference on Finance and Accounting.
Saif-Alyousfi, A.Y., Md-Rus, R., Taufil-Mohd, K.N., Taib, H.M. & Shahar, H.K. (2020). Determinants of capital structure: evidence from Malaysian firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 12(3/4), 283-326.  https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-09-2019-0202
Souri, A. (2020). Econometrics with the application of Eviews 8 and Stata 12. Tehran: Farahang Shenasi Publishing. [In Persian].
Titman, S. & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance43(1), 1-19. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
Torres-Reyna, O. (2007). Panel data analysis fixed and random effects using Stata (v. 4.2). Data & Statistical Services, Priceton University, 112, 49
Vaz da Fonseca, P., Nascimento Jucá, M. & Toshiro Nakamura, W. (2020). Debt tax benefits in a high tax emerging market: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(2), 35-52. http://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/442