Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop a model for determining an optimal bidding strategy for electricity producers, including the recommended selling price and the amount of electricity to be offered for participation in both the competitive electricity market and the energy exchange market. Hourly bids are suggested for the electricity market, while a monthly package, comprising peak load, medium load, low load, and base load, is proposed for the exchange market. By modeling a self-scheduling problem, the study aimed to develop optimal power production plans that maximize net profit over a one-month period. The research approach involved mathematical modeling using mixed-integer non-linear programming, which was performed in Lingo software and then validated in terms of effectiveness through an application to the case of a thermal power station. Relying on fuzzy necessity, credibility, and possibility, the research presented a robust model against the uncertainty of price with an adjustable level of robustness. Sensitivity analysis and the simulation approach were used to validate the performance of the model, demonstrating that the optimal response from the robust model, compared to the deterministic model, can maintain its efficiency in the face of fluctuations in the parameter of price uncertainty. Furthermore, the findings indicated that offering a base load package on the energy exchange market can yield a higher net profit value for the producer. Finally, the fuzzy interest rate and decision-making based on fuzzy goals were also examined.
1. Introduction
In recent years, researchers have directed their attention toward robust optimization in markets with uniform pricing systems. However, the application of robust methods in pay-as-bid systems remains unexplored. Therefore, a notable research gap exists, specifically in the robust optimization of pay-as-bid systems in the Iranian electricity market. Moreover, with the establishment of the energy exchange market in Iran, the simultaneous bidding, in both the energy exchange market and the day-ahead electricity market, has surfaced as a significant gap in existing research literature. In this respect, the present study contributes to relevant research by addressing existing gaps while considering the specific needs of the Iranian electricity market. The study tried to model the self-scheduling problem of an electricity producer to determine an optimal and robust strategy. Employing fuzzy theory to address the uncertainty of the market clearing price parameter, the model can protect the producer from electricity price uncertainty in the market, as well as foster a more secure environment for participation in competitive electricity markets.
2. Materials and Methods
As an applied and developmental research, the present study aimed to develop robust optimization models for bidding in the electricity market. This descriptive–analytical study examined, described, and explained uncertainty in decision-making, employing a fuzzy approach to tackle uncertainty. The research involved the mathematical modeling of the problem of determining the bidding strategy for electricity producers, presented as mixed-integer programming. First, the variables and parameters of the modeling process were introduced, followed by presenting the problem formulation. Subsequently, the implementation and its procedural steps were performed in the Lingo software to validate the effectiveness of the proposed model by applying it to the case of a thermal power station.
 
3.Results and Discussion
The research proposed a model designed to address bidding challenges encountered by a price-taker electricity producer. The model centers on optimizing simultaneous monthly bidding in both the day-ahead electricity market and the energy exchange market. The objective is to optimally allocate the producer’s capacity between these two markets to maximize profit. To handle the uncertainty of electricity prices, a robust method is employed, necessitating estimates of the next day’s market price and the energy exchange price for the upcoming month. The proposed model underwent testing across various modes, including base load, off-peak load, medium load, and peak load packages. The results revealed that the producer’s profit is maximized when offering the base load package to the energy exchange market, followed by the medium load package. Peak and off-peak packages ranked third with equal values. Therefore, it is recommended for producers seeking participation in the energy exchange market to consider offering a base load package.
4. Conclusion
The present research employed a robust fuzzy technique to deal with the volatility of electricity market prices, allowing decision-makers to make firm decisions with an adjustable level of robustness. The results of the proposed method indicated that the possibility criterion adopts an optimistic stance towards the settlement price, thus suggesting prices at higher levels than the necessity and credibility criteria. This criterion is suitable only when market signals indicate a potential price increase. In contrast, the necessity criterion adopts a cautious approach, showing robustness even at low confidence levels. This approach is well-suited for risk-averse decision-makers and scenarios where market signals point towards a potential price reduction.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aien, M., Rashidinejad, M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. (2015). GENCO’s decision making considering power market uncertainties, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Energy Department, kerman. (In Persian)
Dehghan, E. (2021). A mathematical model for integrated production and transport routing planning of closed-loop supply chains under uncertainty, the Ph.D. degree Graduate, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.  (In Persian)
Esmaeily, A., Ahmadi, A., Raeisi, F., Ahmadi, M. R., Nezhad, A. E., & Janghorbani, M. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-integer linear programming for day-ahead hydro-thermal self-scheduling considering price uncertainty and forced outage rate. Energy, 122, 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.089
Goroohi Sardou, I., & Ansari, M. (2020). Risk-constrained self-scheduling of a generation company considering natural gas flexibilities for wind energy integration. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 12(1). 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5119863
Itaba, S., & Mori, H. (2017). A fuzzy-preconditioned GRBFN model for electricity price forecasting. Procedia computer science, 114, 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.010
Jabari, F., Mohammadi-ivatloo, B., & Mohammadpourfard, M. (2019). Robust optimal self-scheduling of potable water and power producers under uncertain electricity prices. Applied Thermal Engineering, 162, 114258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114258
Jalilvand Nejad, A. (2016). Developing a robust model to manage power selling in the competitive market, the Ph.D. degree Graduate, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.  (In Persian)
Jiao, P. H., Chen, J. J., Qi, B. X., Zhao, Y. L., & Peng, K. (2019). Electricity price driven active distribution network planning considering uncertain wind power and electricity price. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 107, 422-437.
 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.12.005
Kazerooni, A., Kiyani, P., & Mozaffari, Z. (2016). Determination of interest rate in Iran by using Fuzzy logic method. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 9(30), 77-93. (In Persian)
Khaloie, H., Abdollahi, A., Rashidinejad, M., & Siano, P. (2019). Risk-based probabilistic-possibilistic self-scheduling considering high-impact low-probability events uncertainty. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 110, 598-612.
Khorasani, J., Monabbati, E., & Rajabi Mashhadi, H. (2018). Designing an optimal linear bid function in a pay-as-bid electricity market. International Journal of Industrial Electronics Control and Optimization, 1(2), 133-142.
Kianvand, M., & Farzinvash, A. (2015). The effect of electricity forward contracts trading in the energy exchange on the volatility of spot prices in Iran electricity market. Iranian Energy Economics, 4(16), 181-207. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22054/jiee.2015.1897
Mashhour, E. Tafreshi, M. MRahim zadeh, S. (2009). Restructuring and general principles of electricity pricing in a competitive environment. K. N Toosi University Publications
Mazzi, N., Kazempour, J., & Pinson, P. (2017). Price-taker offering strategy in electricity pay-as-bid markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33(2), 2175-2183. https://doi.org10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2737322
Moshiri, S., Morovat, H., Fallahi, F., Asghari Oskoei, M. R., & Doustizadeh, M. (2019). The effects of electricity market reform on electricity prices and the power plants’ technology mix: an agent-based modelling approach. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 24(81), 1-42. (In Persian)  https://doi.org/10.22054/ijer.2019.11685
Najafi, A., Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., Jasinski, M., Lehtonen, M., & Leonowicz, Z. (2022). A medium-term hybrid IGDT-Robust optimization model for optimal self scheduling of multi-carrier energy systems. Energy, 238, 121661.
Nazari Farsani, V. & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K. (2019). A new approach for interval forecasting of electricity price based on deep learning, the Degree of Master Graduate Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Nojavan, S., Nourollahi, R., Pashaei-Didani, H., & Zare, K. (2019). Uncertainty-based electricity procurement by retailer using robust optimization approach in the presence of demand response exchange. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 105, 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.08.041
 
Nojavan, S., & Zare, K. (2018a). Interval optimization-based performance of photovoltaic/wind/FC/electrolyzer/electric vehicles in energy price determination for customers by electricity retailer. Solar Energy, 171, 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.004
Nojavan, S., & Zare, K. (2018b). Optimal energy pricing for consumers by electricity retailer. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 102, 401–412.
Nojavan, S., Zare, K., & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (2017). Robust bidding and offering strategies of electricity retailer under multi-tariff pricing. Energy Economics, 68, 359-372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.027
Parvaresh, M., Mohtavi Pour, S.S. (2017). A new optimal bidding strategy for generation compahies (GENCOS), the Degree of Master University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran. (In Persian)
Raei, R. &Karami, H. (2014). Examining the potential of the energy exchange in performance resistive economic policies and transparency in capital market information. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 4(13), 167-194. (In Persian)
Rahimi, S., Nazemi, A. & Mamipour, S. (2017). Modeling and forecasting short-term electricity prices in the Iranian market by using a combination of neural network-fuzzy with particle swarm optimization algorithm, the Degree of Master Graduate, University of kharazmi, Tehran, Iran.  (In Persian)
Rajabi, A. (2019). An analysis of the trading situation of the electricity sector in the country's energy exchange. Vice President of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs, Office of Energy, Industry and Mining Studies.
Rajabi Mashhadi, H. & Khorasani, J. (2013). Price-takers’ bidding strategies in joint energy and spinning reserve pay-as-bid markets. In Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 9(1). 36-43. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17352827.2013.9.1.1.0 
Vatani, B., Chowdhury, B., Dehghan, S. & Amjady, N. (2018). A critical review of robust self-scheduling for generation companies under electricity price uncertainty. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 97, 428–439.
Yazdaninejad, M., & Amjady, N. (2017). Risk-minimizing stochastic self-scheduling model for microgrid in day-ahead electricity market. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 27(5). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2302
Yazdaninejad, M., Amjady, N. & Dehghan, S. (2020). VPP self-scheduling strategy using multi-horizon IGDT, enhanced normalized normal constraint, and bi-directional decision-making approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(4), 3632-3645.