Reza Yousefi Hajiabad; Zohreh Hooshmand; Maryam Khoshnevis
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the interaction effects of risk, capitalization and inefficiency in Iran's banking system. For this purpose, combined data of commercial and private banks of Iran in years (1999-2012), were collected and analyzed using simultaneous equation approach and ...
Read More
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the interaction effects of risk, capitalization and inefficiency in Iran's banking system. For this purpose, combined data of commercial and private banks of Iran in years (1999-2012), were collected and analyzed using simultaneous equation approach and fixed effects two-stage least squares (FE2SLS), The results confirm the belief that these three variables are simultaneously determined. The results indicate that relationship between inefficiency with quality of loans is significant and positive. Capitalization and loan growth have positive effect on inefficiency. Capital accumulation will decrease quality loans. Capital accumulation also has negative effects on the quality of banking risk indicator.On the other hand ,due to the inefficiency of the banking system's cost and return on assets on capital accumulation, banks that aren't in a good position in terms of performance, are not in a right position in terms of equipping and capital accumulation either.
Seyed Komail Tayebi; Mohammad Omidinezhad; Abbas Motahari Nejad
Volume 13, Issue 41 , February 2010, , Pages 1-28
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to measure cost and profit efficiency for the Iran's commercial and public banks. We also determine time variant efficiency factors for period 1381-1384 (2001-2004). To measure the efficiency, we use stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and error component model following ...
Read More
The purpose of this research is to measure cost and profit efficiency for the Iran's commercial and public banks. We also determine time variant efficiency factors for period 1381-1384 (2001-2004). To measure the efficiency, we use stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and error component model following Battese and Coelli (1992) using the Maximum Likelihood method and a panel data. Labor, physical capital, and financial capital are considered as inputs, and loans, bonds and other earning assets as outputs. The results show that most of the private banks are more efficient in profit efficiency than public banks, while most of the public banks are more efficient than private banks in cost efficiency. The cost efficiency has decreased but the profit efficiency has increased for the period under consideration. Profit efficiency is not positively correlated with cost efficiency, suggesting the possibility that cost and revenue inefficiencies may be negatively correlated. Cost efficiency ranges from 46.88 percent (Bank Saderat) to 91.58 percent (Bank Tejarat) with an average of 68.8 percent, and profit efficiency from 61.16 percent (Bank Melli) to 94.85 percent (Bank Sepah) with an average of 85.3 percent. Average and variance of profit efficiency is more than those of cost efficiency, implying profit efficiency is influenced by more variables.
