Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Institute for management and planning studies, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Macroeconomic equilibrium depends on both current and future behaviour of the monetary authority. Policymaker can manage economic agents' expectation by determining a specific rule in monetary policy and commit to it. There is a vast literature on central banks incentive in instrument and target choice in monetary economics. According to this literature, this paper studies discretionary and Ramsey optimal monetary policies for Iran in a small open economy dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model which is modified to capture the properties of the economy of Iran. The empirical results show that if there is a commitment to targets, monetary authority can control inflation. However, if the authority implements discretionary monetary policy, despite having two policy instruments of monetary base growth rate and nominal exchange rate depreciation, central bank could not manage expectations and would face inflation bias and higher volatilities.

شاه‌حسینی، سمیه و جاوید بهرامی (۱۳۹۱)، «طراحی یک مدل تعادل عمومی پویای تصادفی کینزی جدید برای اقتصاد ایران با در نظر گرفتن بخش بانکی»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران،  شماره ۵۳، زمستان، صص ۸۳-۵۵.
Adolfson, M., Laséen, S., Lindé, J., & Villani, M. (2007), “Bayesian Estimation of an Open Economy DSGE Model with Incomplete Pass–through.” Journal of International Economics, 72, 481–511.
Balke, N. S., Brown, S. P., & Yucel, M. K. (2010), “Oil Price Socks and U.S. Economic Activity: An International Perspective.” RFF Discussion Paper, 10-37.
Bernanke, B. S., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F. S., & Posen, A. S. (1999), “Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998), “General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations.” Journal of computational and graphical statistics(7), 434–455.
Calvo, G. A. (1983), “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework.” Journal of Monetary Economics, Sept 12(3), 983–998.
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (2005), “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1–45.
de Walque, G., Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2005), “An Estimated Two-Country DSGE Model for the Euro Area and the US Economy.” ECB mimeo.
Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.
Felices, G., & Tuesta, V. (2010), “Monetary Policy in a Dual Currency Environment.” Central Reserve Bank of Peru Working Paper.
Galì, J. (1999), “Technlogy, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?” The American Economic Review, 89, 249–271.
Giannoni, M., & Woodford, M. (2004), “Optimal Inflation-Targeting Rules.” NBER Chapters, in: The Inflation-Targeting Debate. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 93-172.
Guender, A., & Sander, N. (2011), “(Re) Introducing Money into the New Keynesian Framework: Does It Matter?” Reserve Bank of New Zealand Working Paper.
Kim, I., & Lougani, P. (1992), “The Role of Energy in Real Business Cycle Models.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 557-576.
Leeper, E. M., Walker, T., & Yang, S. C. (2010), “Government Investment and Fiscal Stimulus.” Journal of Monetary Economics(57), 1000–1012.
Medina, J., & Soto, C. (2005), “Oil Shocks and Moneary Policy in an Estimated DSGE Model for a Small Open Economy.” Central Bank of Chile WP nr 353.
Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2003), “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1123–1175.